Imagine a freelancer rewriting another post because nobody has asked to buy their service.
For a fixed price, they automate client onboarding for small agencies: collecting client details, sending reminders and setting up the project. People say it sounds useful. So far, that hasn't led to a discussion about hiring them.
Has an agency owner had a fair chance to consider the service if hardly anyone sees the posts?
So the next week goes into a better opening, a clearer example, a sharper description of the problem.
The reasoning makes sense. Better posts could reach agency owners who need the work done. Rewriting is also something the freelancer can do themselves. Getting a buyer to respond depends on someone else.
But giving the service a fair chance has started to mean getting the account to take off first.
They now have another job: building an audience they hope will eventually bring inquiries. While they work on that, they still have no concrete buying feedback to guide changes to the service or its price.
An agency owner needs to understand the service and trust the person delivering it. An introduction from someone they already work with could help build that trust.
An owner who's still chasing client details by email could weigh the fixed-price setup against continuing to do it manually, even while the freelancer's posts reach very few people.
Finding someone willing to make that introduction and earning the owner's trust would take work, especially without an existing network. It might not lead to a conversation, let alone a sale. But building an audience wouldn't be the freelancer's only route anymore.
I'd keep publishing and put some of next week's editing time into getting a relevant agency owner to consider the paid service. The conversation has to be about the work and the fee, not about how interesting the posts are.
The service may still need changing. The price may be wrong. Those questions don't have to wait for the account to take off.
Top comments (2)
One thing that helps here: count conversations about the fee, not views. If a few agency owners have seen the offer and nobody asked the price, that is a different problem from nobody seeing it at all. Low traffic and no sales means get more qualified traffic or kill the offer. Some traffic and no sales means the offer itself needs work, usually the scope or the price.
For the onboarding example, I'd also shrink the first offer. A fixed-price "we set up your client intake form and reminder sequence for one service line, done in 5 days" is easier to say yes to than full onboarding automation. The first few sales get fulfilled mostly by hand, and each one shows which part repeats and is worth automating.
So yes, keep writing, but give every post one clear paid outcome with a price on it. Then the replies you get are buying feedback instead of compliments.
Making the scope and fee concrete helps a buyer weigh the offer. I'd separate that from putting a price in every post, though. An introduction could put that same offer in front of an agency owner who's dealing with the problem now. The freelancer then has a chance of a direct conversation about that work while the posts are still reaching very few people.