DEV Community

Is DEV.to Analytics broken? 🤔

EffessDev on September 24, 2026

This is the traffic sources graph for a post I created a few hours ago: It's not just this post. Every single one of my posts is dominated by di...
Collapse
 
francistrdev profile image
FrancisTRᴅᴇᴠ •

@jess Brought this issue up on Forem awhile ago, but seems to be fix (question mark?)

Article analytics not showing external referrer breakdown #23475

Describe the bug

Not seeing a breakdown of external referrers for some posts. In a team discussion, it was suggested that these views may have been from dev.to but miscategorized. Either way, it is unusual for there to be no other referrers.

Image

Expected behavior

A clear breakdown of the different referral sources, such as:

Image

Screenshots

I would raise up in the issues on Forem again since sometimes it is fixed, but later it comes back.

Collapse
 
effessdev profile image
EffessDev •

In the issue you mentioned, it's showing "All other external referrers":

But in my case, it's showing "Direct / Unknown":

Is it still the same issue? I read the current issues, but couldn't find a similar one. Maybe there are that many Direct / Unknown visits? From bots perhaps?

Collapse
 
francistrdev profile image
FrancisTRᴅᴇᴠ •

Probably similar? Not sure what Direct / Unknown is referring to, but I would bring this up on the Issues on GitHub.

Thread Thread
 
effessdev profile image
EffessDev •

But I am unsure what to say about the issue. We do not have the actual number of Direct / Unknown views, right?

Thread Thread
 
francistrdev profile image
FrancisTRᴅᴇᴠ •

Yes. Try your best to describe what your experiencing. Otherwise, if others have questions, they will let you know!

Thread Thread
 
effessdev profile image
EffessDev •

Yeah. Then I'll open an issue about my original problem - too many Direct / Unknown views. Is that ok?

Collapse
 
unitbuilds profile image
UnitBuilds •

Yeah, I saw that a few months ago. It gets even weirder when you look at followers, read times, etc. ALOT of Dev.to traffic is bots. For what purpose? Probably data mining for AI training? So dont pay much mind to the stats, it's the same reason why you wake up 1 day and suddenly get 200+ new followers, but when you look at their profiles, most are just generic shells, no comments, no posts, not even a bio.

Collapse
 
unitbuilds profile image
UnitBuilds •

Actually 1 of the reasons why I made DevGuard, they havent implemented it yet, but it's essentially an anti-bot system (I had some experience bypassing WAF with MCP-Lite, so I used that as the basis of how to flag a bot), that counts for profiles, readers, comments, everything. Cuz it's traffic that they pay for, people think that hosting a server is all it takes, but you pay for network use too and the bots likely account for a serious amount of traffic...

Collapse
 
effessdev profile image
EffessDev •

So, that's probably the reason behind the many followers on my profile who haven't read a single one of my posts? I have also got a few purely promotional comments that have nothing to do with my post. Fortunately, they were automatically removed. But I still got the notification.

Thread Thread
 
unitbuilds profile image
UnitBuilds •

Yip. It is unfortunate, 99% of them woulda been filtered out if they used cloudflare proxying, but it is what it is. That's why readers and readtimes cant be trusted, so best option is run on engagement to judge (comments and likes). The bots have no reason to like or comment and the bot comments are (mostly) filtered out.

Thread Thread
 
effessdev profile image
EffessDev •

Yeah. It's quite good at filtering comments. But it has many false positives. But that's ok, it works.

Collapse
 
effessdev profile image
EffessDev • • Edited

You mean devguard.org? Or something else?

Collapse
 
xulingfeng profile image
xulingfeng •

Maybe Google's crawler

Collapse
 
effessdev profile image
EffessDev •

Is it similar in your posts as well?

Collapse
 
xulingfeng profile image
xulingfeng •

yes