Horrrrrreyyyyyy! Guys, I finally hit 1K followers! ππ I'm sooo happy! Yeah, most of them might be bots, but still, I've never had 1K followers before. This is the first time I've ever seen my follower count reach 1K!
Spacial followers
π₯@maame-codes
π₯@ndcodes
π₯@csm18
π₯@nyaomaru
π₯@dev2023-op
π₯@xulingfeng
π₯@effessdev
π₯@akhourianmolkumar
π₯@gtref
π₯@hemapriya_kanagala
Top comments (33)
This quickly?! π€― Congrats! πππ Thanks for including me on the list π
Thanks for your support bro! Appreciate it!π₯°
I appreciate you including me on the list πππ
No problem, bro! π₯°Youβre my friend. Bro, what kind of content should we create for our organization ?
Rust?
π€£
You : I don't know!
Me : you know everythingπ’
What does that mean? π€
When I ask you a question, you donβt give me any ideas, and when I asked @technogamerz, he hasnβt even replied yet or liked my comment.
She might be busy...
How do you know?
Because she's pursuing MBA?
But she used to be online before, right?π€
Maybe she has become busy now?
Hmm maybe!
Guess what? You've got one more follower, and I'm definitely not a bot (I can prove it).π
Keep up the great work!β
Thanks π₯° I know you are not a bot!
A thousand followers in a week is a number that makes me ask what actually did the converting, because I spent this week counting followers gained across my own surfaces and the honest result was nearly flat despite replies and views climbing. The one exception in my own data was a single substantive reply that moved more followers than weeks of original posts, which taught me that the count follows the conversation, not the post. Your list of people in the post suggests the community did a lot of the lifting here, and that's a real mechanism, not a vanity number. What would you say converted most β the posts themselves, the comment threads, or the people you named showing up for you?
If I were to give you some advice, Iβd suggest that you first engage with other peopleβs posts by commenting and reacting to them. Donβt do too much at once, though, as the Dev algorithm might mistake you for a bot. You should also create and share your own posts. Thatβs just my suggestion!
The pacing point is fair, and I would add a sharper filter than volume: a reply only earns a return visit when it challenges a specific claim, not when it just agrees. In my experience, broad commenting got polite likes and almost no return readers, while a comment that named a counterexample β for example, a case where the author's rule broke β brought the author back to my own posts. Creating your own posts helps for the same reason only if the post makes a testable claim a reader can argue with. Do you find that a specific disagreement converts better than a supportive comment, or is it the other way around for you?
Congras! πΈπ
Thanks π₯°
Rising star! π₯
Yeah bro π₯π₯° Thanks π₯°β¨π½
Congratulations, Star, and thank you for the mention. On content: write about the tech you love, the struggles, and your own take on what you learned, because a post someone can argue with gets replies, while a post nobody can disagree with just gets likes.
Thanks π₯° Okay bro!π
Well done on reaching 1K!
Thanks my friend! π
Also I appreciate the mention on the list.π
Yes, youβre not just a member of our org, youβre our friend toooo!
Nice One! Thanks for the credit
No problem! Thanks π₯°